Social Role
Valorisation and the community
Social
roles are how we see ourselves and others in society. They are often
about a particular characteristic (age, gender, race, ethnicity,
culture, occupation, disability or even ability) rather than the
person. A Muslim, for example, is often treated different because of
his/her religion and culture. If the Muslim also had a particular
disability or disadvantage, that person would have less chance of
becoming a valued member in society. The same can be said for an
aboriginal, a bikie or drugie, or possibily even a bank manager or used
car salesman.
SRV is designed to enhance Social Images and Personal Competencies
where disadvantaged people are more likely to be included in society
(at a personal level, the immediate social system around that person
(family, friends, colleagues, workers in institutions etc.), the
intermediate social system that the person interacts with (people in
shops, banks, organisations etc. plus those institutions themselves.)
and the larger society- the socio-political-economic structures of
society. (
Diligio:
Social Role Valorization - Understanding SRV (April 2004). P.79-80).
The paradigm focuses on creating valued roles for the person within the
community. There is nothing about creating a valued role for the
community, or the roles of the members of the community in supporting
people with high support needs.
I feel that the SRV needs to be reformulated to include:
All
members of all communities, clubs and groups within society.
Where they are all
valued, and have a
valued role in participating in
each community (club, group or organisation) within society,
that is most appropriate
to their own
needs, as well as the needs of
each community in which they participate,
where the outcomes are
positively
valued by ALL members of the
community, as well as other communities that it is a part of.
The above has more relevance in today’s society. Generally, the
conditions that people with disability live in today have changed. They
are more likely to have a valued role in society. Whether they are any
better of today, as compared to the conditions that they lived in and
the conditions of the society that they lived in, is open to conjecture
and is being debated by the various stakeholders in society. We see
that the current formulation of SRV can not deal with the changing
needs of the communities that people with high support needs are placed
in.
A community approach to SRV, on the other hand, is more inclusive and
more descriptive (explicit) in the sense that the term "community" can
be used to describe our roles, relationships, behaviours and
expectations with each other. A school community, for example, is
different to a living community, which is different to a recreational
community. A community can also be a part of an organisation or service
that provides specialised care, where that care is unavailable in the
wider community. While each community is different and has different
outcomes, they share simular characteristics and institutions.
The above also means that the community (living, recreational,
education or employment) is more directly involved in the process. By
understanding the roles of communities, and how they relate to their
members, and the role of the various institutions (their
"Construction") of these communities, all members are valued and have a
valued role within the community that is most appropriate for their
needs.
We (that do not have a disability) have the choice to participate in
the community that most suits our needs. We have the choice to go to a
hospital when we are sick. We find the recreation community that most
suits our interests. We have, or find, something of value that we can
bring to the community. Even in a school or university, we bring some
skills and experiences and use those as steps in a ladder to gain more
skills and experiences. We develop relationships, acquaintances and
friendships, and form groups (mini communities) where we support each
other. Each community is valued by it's members as well as the
communities that it a part of.
Of course this is only in the theoretical realm. In reality things do
not happen this way. Communities are not perfect places and the members
are not perfect. In all communities there are good things and bad
things and we can never get everything we may want. We may never always
get the community we want, and have to compromise our values or ideals
or expectations bieng a part of a community. We see this all the time
where people find the security of the community more important than the
way they are treated or that the institutions of the community are
against their own principles. We also see hidden agendas, internal
politics, power plays, where members try to change the community for
any number of reasons.
Communities are the very essence of how we see ourselves; see others,
our roles, behaviours and expectations of others and ourselves. They
are the means by which we fulfil all other needs. Without a purpose or
reason for living, other needs such as food or shelter may become
meaningless. Sometimes the needs of food and shelter come before our
choice of community that we want to be a part of. To some extent
communities are determined by our own deeds. We may choose one
community over another to satisfy those needs, however, it is the
community that we have committed to that ultimately fulfils the
particular need.
A successful actor/singer may choose the community of his/her
profession (the glitz and glamour, the fans etc) in order to fulfil
his/her needs of food and shelter rather that the community of a
family. Alternatively, we may want to work as a lawyer, for example, to
feed and shelter ourself and our family, but can only find work as a
gardener or something else that we would prefer not to do. In this case
it is the community of the family that keeps us going. Community
provides the motivation, the support, the strength to carry on. It is
this internal bond with others that we love and care about that bring a
sense of reality to our lives. Where a person has lost the will to live
because of a severe injury, illness or disability. They may become
disillusioned, isolated, may be angry or have some hatred for the
system that put them there. They need the care and support (valued)
just as the other members of the community need the care and support
(valued) in looking after the person. Even people with severe mental
illnesses need the care and support within their own community where
they are valued as a part of their community.
Whether the community is a part of another community, an organisation
or service provider, a nursing home or an asylum, a home or a group
home, a company or sheltered workshop, a community recreation group or
a disability recreation group, the principles are all the same. The
members need to have valued roles and be valued within their community,
where the community is valued by its members as well as the other
communities that it is a part of.
Even a prison, we see communities within communities. We see various
groups that support each other and the members are valued within each
group. There are rival groups that compete with each other for power
within the prison. There are particular cultures (institutions) within
these groups within the culture (institution) of the prison. The prison
is also a community within the wider community where the members of the
wider community are protected (valued role) from the members of the
prison. The prison also has a valued role in re-institutionalising
(corrective services) its members where they are able to participate in
and contribute to the wider community in a positive way.
Within a disability service provider we also see various groups that
compete with each other for power. We see the members of each group
support each other and the members are valued within each group. These
groups have various cultures (institutions) within the culture
(institution) of the disability service provider. The value of the
disability service provider is determined by the value of it's outcomes
for the members of the disability service provider, as well as the
members of the wider community that it is a part of.
From
the above it can be seen that the values of the outcomes of the
community and its members
within the wider
community determine
the
value of the community within the wider community.
Each community has a particular role that fulfils a particular need.
Valued community roles provide a common cause or focus for the
community, as well as other communities that are a part of it.
Valued communities provide valued roles for their members.
Social role valorisation provides valued roles for ALL members of the
community.
Communities that have valued roles in society …
... The spiritual community
... The family community
... The living community
... The recreational community
... The learning community
... The employment community
... The health community
... The internet community
... The blind community
... The disability community
etc
The values of community start in the home where children have valued
roles in supporting others at school, sport or any other community that
they participate in.
Communities that have de-valued roles in society …
... The AIDS community
... The drugs / rave communities
... The criminal community
... The gay / lesbian communities
... The Muslim community
... The bikie community
... The street community
... The unemployment / homeless communities
... The aged community
... The single parent community
etc
When providing the most
appropriate
care for people with high support
needs ...
1) The community is not
where the
person is living, but where the
person participates, shares experiences and has valued relationships
with others.
2) People with high support needs (severe disability, aged etc.)
will always need support structures as a part of their lives.
3) The amount of participation in a community (living, education,
employment or recreation) is directly related to the skills and
resources of the person, and, the skills and resources of the
community that the person wishes to participate in.
4) Institutions are going to be around in one form or another
whether we like it or not, It is the way that they are used that is the
problem.
5) The institutions of a society towards a particular group
determine the way the group participates in society.
6) The institutions of a particular government department,
organisation,
profession or service define the way the person is supported within
that society.
7) Facilities that support people with high support needs do not
need to be the nursing homes or prisons in the
sense
that they are today, but can become warm inviting community places that
offer a range of services to the community, as well as be a part of the
wider community within that society.
8) People with high support needs are a minority group in our
society, and will have the same problems as other minority groups in
being a part of society.
Peter Anderson
http://www.psawa.com